Questions of the day???

So what your saying is that ''girls'' are going to misread the cover and buy paradise instead?.....im confused as to what youve wrote.......HELP....................and what ''SPECIAL PACK?''.....come on zombs explain more im intrigued?.....

....The only way to have a true friend...Is to be one....

I sure would like to see a Viva Pinata landmark in burnout that we could smash through or something.

"The sleep of reason produces monsters" -Goya

So what your saying is that Paradise is going to have a Viva Pinata section of the map ?...............

....The only way to have a true friend...Is to be one....

I wet myself, at how British gaming house's can take the mickey out of each other, as thought but probably no relation anyway, there have been some examples in the past but lost the links, though that Tiger Wood's '09, about the Jesus 'glitch' was funny and in a similar vain of some stuff I have seen.

Patience is something I taught myself, so I never know when it's going to run out?

I would like to take a Revenge Racer, go 300+ on it and hit a Viva Pinata stuff animal....

Don't wake me cause I'm dreaming, of Angels on the moon. Iam Nero Angelo!

Which great component of Cartesian dualism resist the reduction of the psychological phenomenon to the point in the text where the extended meets the unextended?

Contrary to popular belief SUFFER is not a Squirrel.

I too would love to try that ....... maybe better if you had 2 revenge racers facing each other to see who could smash it to pieces first ...........

....The only way to have a true friend...Is to be one....

An interesting question, one must look into reading Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy which I have read and must say is a very confusing book. He has a strong argument in the book about the mind and the body. As in the body (physical) can disappear through illusion or the devil's work, but the only thing that he is certain about is the mind (mental) through which he is thinking, percieving, and understanding the world around him. 

If this mind is the Extended that you are refferring to which is immaterial, and the Body which is the Unextended and material, then you have a problem of Interactionism. How can the immaterial mind interact with the material body? as in How can the extended meet the unextended? 

So I will take a shot at this an say that this must be answered through looking at how the mind works. If you want to argue that God is the reason that the mind interacts with body then, Parallelism maybe the answer to the question. But since Im more into sciences than religion I will say that the answer might be Ephiphenomenalism.

Every mental event is caused by a physical event.  A neuron must fire off first in order for thinking to occur, or anything to occur. Meaning mental events are relient on physical events. This obviously is also a theory to try and tie the mind and body into interacting with each other, thus this might be the answer to your question from my point of view. Look in up in Wikipedia.

Of course, I could be wrong because there are many points of view into answering this. Of course I could be totally wrong about this, but if Iam I would like to get an explanation as to how.. As stated, that is an interesting question. I didnt really take Philosophical studies in college. So Im not actually answering this question because in truth the question still exists today and theories have been raised to try and solve this argument. 

"Take the light, undarken everything around me." "Call the clouds and listen closely I'm lost without you." "Call your name every day when I feel so helpless." "I've fallen down but I'll rise above this, rise above this."

Henri Bergson The French philosopher (1859-1941), as it clearly stated in my headline.

But still Nito, very impressive indeed, wrong but impressive.

my dog ate my disc.

 WOW........that was .... well ...... lets just say that sums up 2 words in my mind ''CONFUSING'' and ''EMOTIONAL''.....

....The only way to have a true friend...Is to be one....

One thing that I noticed, is that there is this ongoing fued that people created between Science and God...A natural trait as humans is too want to know just about everything and also to control things in a positive or a good way.  One can argue that Science...true Science is from God.  SO talking about how this and that works is fine, but where does that come from?

Then there comes man, man tries to theorize things.  Some discoveries in science, scientists have accredited God on giving them the right path for them to follow as a train of thought.  Then you have a man who does not believe in God and puts together his own theory, and then find evidence that he feels can support it and make it appear to be true.  Then it becomes common acceptence, and called a "Proven theory"...why don't they just call it a fact? Well, because there is still too many holes.

My point is that true Science comes from God, and when man tries to become God, then his science becomes tainted.  He has already lost, no matter how many people he can get to believe his theory.

"The sleep of reason produces monsters" -Goya

So Im assuming that you support Creationism??....if this is what you meant by "True science".....  Which isnt Science at all....

"Take the light, undarken everything around me." "Call the clouds and listen closely I'm lost without you." "Call your name every day when I feel so helpless." "I've fallen down but I'll rise above this, rise above this."

We all choose what we choose to believe.  It's as simple as that.  I'm just putting another theory out there, nothing wrong with that.

"The sleep of reason produces monsters" -Goya